preop postop
[Discussion]
The caudal septum is considered the most important anatomic structure in providing nasal base support. Stabilizing the nasal base is a critical step in correction of the short nose. It can provide a good long-term outcome with preservation of the nasal tip projection. However, in Asian patients, the qualities of the caudal nasal septum are occasionally unsuitable. For instance, it may be very thin or weak, or it may be curved or distorted. Under these circumstances, achieving a stable support is difficult. Additionally, the amount of donor septal or conchal cartilages is occasionally limited and makes the buildup of a stable nasal base even more difficult. Therefore, when an extension graft is fixated to the caudal septum for lengthening the nose, the summation force (including the generated reaction force, the postoperative scar contraction force, and gravity) may shift the cartilage grafts to either side of the caudal septum and subsequently lead to the collapse and deviation of the nasal tip or nose elongation failure (Figure 2). In some situations, patients may even develop a one-side check-valve nasal obstruction because of the distorted dorsal-caudal nasal septum (Figure 2). When the short-nosed Asian patient presents with a weak or deviated caudal septum, the placement of spreader grafts or extended spreader grafts alone or in conjunction with a floating-type columella strut8 may create similar problems.
Figure 2. When the caudal septum is very pliable, deviated, or overresected, it may collapse and result in loss of tip projection or subsequent failure of the nose elongation. The inset illustration shows the potential one-side check-valve nasal obstruction developed as a result of a distorted dorsal-caudal nasal septum. Reprinted with permission.
To overcome problems resulting from caudal septal instability, the caudal septum can be replaced in situ with batten grafts or septal replacement.9 However, batten grafts are usually difficult and may not easily allow complete elimination of the residual inherent tensile forces or cartilage memory of the deviated caudal septum, which may result in distortion later. Septal replacement is designed to remove the caudal septum and then replace it either after external remodeling with batten grafts or replace it completely with an alternative material, such as autogenous or banked rib cartilage grafts.10-16 However, many patients may be reluctant to undergo rib cartilage grafting surgery because of its invasiveness, rigidity, and potential warping problems. The caudal septal advancement technique therefore has several advantages. First, the caudal septum can be externally reinforced with batten grafts. Second, the caudal septum is not just replaced, but also advanced as a fixed-type columella strut graft, so the stability of the nasal base can be predictably achieved. Last, the strut cartilage graft is saved. Therefore, caudal septal advancement is strongly indicated in a patient with a more pliable, flimsy, or deviated caudal septum or with marginal shortage of cartilage graft supply.
The difference between Dini and Ferreira’s report5 and the present study is the sequence of the procedures. Dini and Ferreira externally fixated the spreader graft to the L-shaped caudal component first and then reintroduced the caudal septum, with its inferior aspect fixated to the nasal spine. The disadvantage with that sequence is the difficulty of properly angling the spreader graft to the cephalic dorsal septum. Therefore, in the present investigation, the sequence of the procedures was modified by advancing the caudal septum with fixation to the nasal spine first. Spreader grafts were then used to bridge the gap between the caudal septum and the cephalic dorsal septum in the proper angle.
The fixation of caudal septum to the nasal spine must be addressed because an unstable suture may allow the caudal septum to slip out of the midline, resulting in caudal nasal deviation (or the “click” when the patient smiles). Therefore, the fixation of the caudal septal base must be secured with two 5-0 polydioxanone sutures. With increased experience, the author now prefers to suture through two predrilled holes at the nasal spine for stable fixation.
To date, the literature contains no reports addressing difficult short nose correction by this integrated approach—that is, by combining caudal septal advancement with external septoplasty. These results show that when patients with short noses present with a weak or deviated caudal septum that is unable to sustain the reaction force induced by nose lengthening, the integrated approach is an appropriate and acceptable alternative to traditional techniques.
As a side note, for augmentation materials, the author prefers to use Gore-Tex rather than silicone implants because Gore-Tex is more biocompatible with the human body, and the long-term risks of capsular contracture and calcification-induced deformation are reduced.17
On the basis of these limited experiences, the author believes that, in Asian patients with short noses and weak or deviated caudal septums or a limited supply of donor conchal or septal cartilage, the application of the caudal septal advancement method can more predictably and efficiently provide a stable nasal base support than the conventional extension grafts, spreader grafts, or extended spreader grafts. This technique is a safe, effective, and reliable alternative to costal cartilage grafts in addressing the difficult short nose.
The author(s) declared no conflicts of interests with respect to
the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.
References
1. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. Lengthening the aesthetically
short nose. Plast Recons Surg 1989;83:793-800.
2. Byrd HS, Andochick S, Copit S, Walton KG. Septal extension
grafts: a method of controlling projection shape.
Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:999-1110.
3. Guyuron B, Varghai A. Lengthening the nose with
a tongue-and-groove technique. Plast Reconstr Surg
2003;111:1533-1539.
4. Jung DH, Moon HJ, Choi SH, Lam SM. Secondary rhinoplasty
of the Asian nose: correction of the contracted
nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004;28:1-7.
5. Dini GM, Ferreira LM. Nose elongation. Plast Reconstr
Surg 2006;118:289-290.
6. Mowlavi A, Masouem S, Kalkanis J, Guyuron B. Septal
cartilage defined: implications for nasal dynamics and
rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:2171-2174.
7. Conrad K, Torgerson CS, Gillman GS. Applications of
GORE-TEX implants in rhinoplasty reexamined after 17
years. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:224-231.
8. Ghavami A, Janis JE, Acikel C, Rhorich RJ. Tip shaping
in primary rhinoplasty: an algorithmic approach. Plast
Reconstr Surg 2008;122:1229-1241.
9. Andre RF, Vuyk HD. Reconstruction of dorsal and/or caudal
nasal septum deformities with septal battens or septal
replacement: an overview and comparison of techniques.
Laryngoscope 2006;116:1668-1673.
10. Haack J, Papel ID. Caudal septal deviation. Otolaryngol
Clin N Am 2009;42:427-436.
11. Toriumi DM. Subtotal reconstruction of the nasal septum:
a preliminary report. Laryngoscope 1994;104:
906-913.
12. Gubisch W. The extracorporeal septum plasty: a technique
to correct difficult nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr
Surg 1995;95:672-682.
13. Gubisch W, Constantinescu MA. Refinements in extracorporeal
septoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1131-
1139; discussion 1140-1142.
14. Gubisch W. Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly
deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:218-226.
15. Murrell GL, Requena R, Wall MP. Septal replacement
for severe anterior septal deviation. Am J Otolaryngol
2000;21:147-152.
16. Pirsig W, Kern EB, Verse T. Reconstruction of anterior
nasal septum: back-to-back autogenous ear cartilage
graft. Laryngoscope 2004;114:627-638.
17. Jung DH, Kim BR, Choi JY, Rho YS, Park HJ, Han WW.
Gross and pathologic analysis of long-term silicone
implants inserted into the human body for augmentation
rhinoplasty: 221 revision cases. Plast Reconstr Surg
2007;120:1997-2003.
回 PART I
