preop 2 years postop
本診所張醫師最新論文"困難朝天鼻整形的新方法----鼻中隔尾端前移術的應用",已經榮獲美國美容外科醫學會雜誌(Asthetic Surgery Journal)接受,於2010年4月出刊.
原文請參考: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090820X10366548
Correction of Difficult Short Nose by Modified Caudal Septal Advancement in Asian Patients
Yean-Lu Chang, MD
Dr. Chang is in private practice in Taipei, Taiwan.
Yean-Lu Chang, MD, Toyoung Plastic Surgery Clinic, 4th Floor, No. 72, Sec. 2, Xin-Yi Road,
Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: chang157@gmail.com
[摘要]
Background: Correction of a short nose, defined by a reduced distance from the nasal radix to the tip, has been regarded as one of the most challenging procedures in rhinoplasty. Some short nose cases are too difficult to treat with conventional grafts because of their scanty, flimsy, pliable, or deviated septum or depleted donor supply of septal or conchal cartilage. Although costal cartilage graft may be an option, patients may be reluctant to undergo this invasive surgery.
Objective: The author presents his two-year aesthetic results from the treatment of difficult short noses with the modified caudal septal advancement method.
Methods: From November 2006 to August 2008, 41 patients (ages 23-59 years) with a short nose were treated with modified caudal septal advancement, with or without extracorporeal septoplasty.
Results: Among the 36 patients who remained for six months to two years of follow-up, 20 patients achieved “excellent” results and 12 patients showed “good” results, both based on nasal lengthening measurements taken by the author. Four patients had only “fair” results. Patients in this last group, including three with overlengthening and one with inadequate elongation, required revision surgery.
Conclusions: In the Asian population, when short-nosed patients present with weak or deviated caudal septums or a limited supply of donor conchal or septal cartilage, the modified caudal septal advancement method can more predictably and efficiently provide a stable nasal base support than the conventional extension grafts, spreader grafts, or extended spreader grafts. The author believes that this technique is a safe, effective, and reliable alternative to costal cartilage grafts in dealing with difficult short noses.
[本文]
The short nose, characterized by a reduced distance from the nasal radix to the tip,1 has represented one of the greatest challenges in rhinoplasty. Conventionally, several techniques have been described for correction of the short nose, including extension grafts,2 spreader grafts, and extended spreader grafts.3 By joining to the stable caudal nasal septum, these grafts increase the nasal length. Therefore, the caudal nasal septum is considered the most important anatomic structure for providing nasal support. According to Newton’s third law, for every action force, there is an equal (in size) and opposite (in direction) reaction force. Likewise, in short nose correction, a reaction force will be generated after the lengthening procedure. Therefore, more stable nasal support is necessary to resist the reaction force (Figure 1). In Caucasian individuals, the remaining nasal septum is thick enough to endure the reaction forces resulting from nose elongation. However, in Asian patients, the septal cartilage is much smaller, thinner, and shorter.4 Especially when a patient with a short nose exhibits a scanty, flimsy, pliable, or deviated septum, the application of the conventional caudal extension grafts, spreader grafts, or extended spreader grafts will lead to a more unstable nasal base. Without stable nasal support, tip ptosis, caudal nasal deviation, and subsequent failure of the elongated nose will develop (Figure 2). We define these situations as “difficult short nose.” On the basis of the concept previously described by Dini and Ferreira,5 the author modified his nose elongation technique—called caudal septal advancement, with or without combined external septoplasty—to treat the difficult short nose. This article reports the author’s experience in treating Asian patients with short noses, the complications encountered during a two-year observation period, and the aesthetic results.
[方法]
From November 2006 to August 2008, 41 patients (ages, 23-50 years) with a short nose were treated by caudal septal advancement. Of the 41 patients, four were lost to follow-up and one patient contracted an infection resulting in removal of the Gore-Tex and refused further rhinoplasty, leaving only 36 patients available for follow-up. Twelve patients were classified as having a primary short nose and 24 patients as having a secondary short nose. Three patients with saddle nose in conjunction with a short nose were also included in this series. The indications for surgery included (1) a short nose with a flimsy or pliable caudal septum that was unable to withstand the reaction force induced by nose elongation, (2) a short nose with caudal septal deviation that was judged intraoperatively to be unable to provide a stable nasal support after nose-lengthening procedures, and (3) a short nose with borderline limited supply of donor conchal or septal cartilage. The preoperative evaluation included physical examination and computer image simulation using Mirror imaging systems (Canfield Scientific, Inc, Fairfield, New Jersey).
Through an open approach, extensive undermining of the nasal skin and radical release of the lower lateral cartilage from the upper lateral cartilage were performed. Subsequently, the central-posterior septal cartilage was resected, to be used as a spreader graft.6 The L-shaped caudal septal component was then removed from its attachments around the nasal spine. To avoid destabilization of the middle nasal vault, the surgeon preserved a stable dorsal strut at least 1.5 cm in length along its anteroposterior axis and 1 cm in width (Figure 3A). Caudal septoplasty was then performed to strengthen and straighten the weak or deviated caudal septum. The batten graft was harvested from the resected central-posterior septum or conchal cartilage, depending on the availability of the donor cartilage. The reconstructed L-shaped caudal septum was reintroduced, with its inferior aspect sutured to the periosteum around the nasal spine or to the cancellous nasal spine by drilling two holes with a 21-gauge needle. Fixation was necessary to prevent the caudal septal strut from slipping out of the midline.5 The spreader grafts that were harvested from the thickest posterior septal base6 or thinner central septum were then placed. When the donor septal cartilage was too small or depleted, the conchal cartilage graft was chosen. In some patients who had a prior extension grafting procedure, the extension graft was carefully dissected and recycled as spreader grafts. The spreader grafts were fixated to the dorsal strut at the keystone area and L-shaped caudal septum, respectively. Finally, nose elongation was completed, with the medial crura sutured to the caudal margin of the advanced septal graft.
In this series, all patients also presented with underdeveloped nasal dorsum, which is very common in Asian patients. We chose Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene or ePTFE; W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, Arizona) for dorsal augmentation because of its high tissue compatibility.7 The 2-mm-thick Gore-Tex was stacked in multiple layers as necessary and sutured into position with the open approach, and a tip cartilage graft was then implanted (Figures 3B and 4).
Patients were scheduled for follow-up at three months, six months, and then every six months thereafter. All patients were evaluated in person by the author. Patient photographs taken at each visit were also analyzed and compared. The amount of nasal lengthening varied, ranging from 2 to 8 mm depending on the final nasal length desired. Measurements were obtained and the results were classified into four groups.3 “Excellent” results indicated that the preoperative aesthetic goals were achieved completely. The outcome was defined as “good” if the nasal length was within 1 mm (shorter or longer) of the planned length. The result was judged as “fair” when the nasal length was 1 to 2 mm too short or too long. Any nasal length over 2 mm shorter or longer than the planned length was classified as “poor.”
Among 36 patients with six months to two years of follow-up, 20 patients achieved “excellent” results (Figures 5, 6, and 7), and 12 patients showed “good” results. Four patients were classified as “fair.” These four patients, including three with overlengthening and one with inadequate elongation, required revision surgery. In the overcorrected cases, the caudal part of the advanced septum was trimmed accordingly. In the undercorrected nose, more conchal cartilage grafts were added to the nasal tip and columella. When smiling, one patient had a “click” in the nasal spine area that required refixation of the base of the caudal septum to the nasal spine. No instances of caudal nasal deviation or destabilization occurred.
Figure 6. A 22-year-old woman who complained of caudal nasal deviation and recurrent short nose after septal extension grafting and Gore-Tex implantation one year previously. Two years after the patient's second surgery, involving augmentation rhinoplasty with caudal septal advancement and external septoplasty because of a nearly depleted donor central septum and a pliable caudal septum. A piece of cartilage from the posterior septum was used as a batten graft to enhance the strength of the caudal septum. The spreader graft was composed of recycled previously-implanted extension graft and conchal cartilage graft. Gore-Tex to the nasal dorsum and a conchal cartilage graft to the tip were applied as well. The patient also received a mastoid fascia-fat graft to her nasal tip seven months prior to these photos to correct skin thinning on the nasal tip.
preop 2 years postop
Figure 7.A 28-year-old woman who complained of severe contracted nose after previous silicone augmentation rhinoplasty. Low-grade infection was suspected. Three months after removal of the silicone implant, the short nose was improved. Two years after reaugmentation rhinoplasty with caudal septal advancement and external septoplasty because of a pliable caudal septum and a nearly depleted donor central septum. Two pieces of conchal cartilage served as a batten graft to enhance the strength of the caudal septum. The spreader grafts consisted of a conchal cartilage graft and a septal graft harvested from the posterior septum. Gore-Tex to the nasal dorsum and a conchal cartilage graft to the tip were applied as well.

請問張醫師,有做甲溝炎的指甲甲床手術或是其他治療甲溝炎的手術嗎? 謝謝!
您好 本診所沒有做甲溝炎的手術,建議您找有健保的診所或醫院做治療
請問張醫師 如果我有鼻中膈彎曲,於鼻整形的時候可以一併矯正嗎? 謝謝您的回答!
您好 鼻中隔彎曲可以在鼻整形同時矯正。同時也利用鼻中隔軟骨來做移植強化。
請問本診所做的鼻子是屬於自然鼻還是高挺鼻呢 作後大概多久會修復完全呢 手術過程會痛嗎
您好: 要自然的鼻型還是要高挺的鼻型,基本上還是看您的喜好,用模擬來分析,並實際了解要墊的高度才是您所要的.因此本診所做出來的鼻子有些是自然派的有一些是高挺的,主要看個人的喜好來決定. 一般鼻整形手術的消腫需要10天至兩週的左右.手術過程要用局部麻醉加睡眠麻醉完全不會疼痛.
醫生您好 聽說最近有一種新的材質叫做卡麥拉鼻模 結合了矽膠以及GORTEX 不知道醫生對於這種材質的看法如何呢?? 用卡麥拉鼻膜隆鼻與單純用GORTEX來隆鼻的差異為何呢? 效果差異為何呢? 價格差異呢? 不好意思我問題好多先謝謝醫生的解答XDDDD 另外請問醫生 敲鼻骨這個程序是會讓鼻子變得更立體更秀氣 請問多加這項程序價格要加多少呢? 一般而言建議敲鼻骨嗎 (若希望鼻子秀氣點的話) 感謝醫生的回答^^
您好: 卡麥拉鼻模是矽膠外包0.3毫米厚的gore-tex所製成,它結合矽膠與gore-tex的優點,同時也去除這兩者的缺點.相輔相成.因此長期效果是不錯的. http://www.wretch.cc/blog/changyang157/17889513 卡麥拉鼻膜和gore-tex費用是差不多的. 有些人鼻樑鼻骨比較寬的,敲鼻骨會讓鼻樑變高挺秀氣.費用方面要當面評估,才能夠清楚的告訴您,因為每個人手術不太一樣.
想問縮鼻翼還有縮鼻孔的價錢(分開) 若與隆鼻一起做價格會有優惠嗎 請問本診所建議縮鼻孔嗎 縮了以後會不會不自然呢 謝謝您的回答!
您好: 這種手術費用需要當面看診評估才能清楚告知.
gore-tex材質,由於需層層堆疊,術後更會有些微縮水 請問醫生這是什麼意思呢
您好: gore-tex的材質是需要看醫師手術當中的處理.如果在手術前做適當的壓縮,術後的變化就比較少. 否則厚度會縮減百分之五十.
請問醫生 因為本人住高雄 隆鼻手術 因為不知道自己本身適合怎樣 是不是最多帶十萬就可以了 還是有人會用到比十萬還要多呢
您好: 每個人的情況都不太一定,因此費用實在無法預估.
請問醫生 隆鼻手術完成需要拆線嗎? 麻藥退完之後會很痛嗎??
您好: 一般鼻整型手術之後第二~三天需要拆引流管,一至二週左右需要拆線.麻醉退了之後,不會有明顯的疼痛感.但是可能會有鼻塞的現象,會持續四五天左右.
*****
*****
請問6/30號方便去諮詢嗎 要預約嗎 因為注高雄 那天要去台北 如果到台北火車站 要怎嚜到本診所呢
您好: 本診所看診一定要事先預約,預約電話02-23932388. 從台北火車站捷運六號出口撘公車,公車可坐信義幹線的公車至金山南路口下車,本診所位置在站牌的同一邊附近.地址是北市信義路二段72號4樓.
請問醫生 Gore-Tex可以讓人體組織輕易附著在上面,與人體的相容 性高;但也因為材質較軟,缺乏彈性,膨脹係數較高,手 術後三至六個月後可能因縮水而鼻形變細、山根後縮而造 成朝天鼻 用Gore-Tex隆鼻之後真的會變成朝天鼻嗎
您好: 用Gore-tex之後並不會造成朝天鼻,會造成朝天鼻的主要原因,是鼻基部的穩定度不足,當傷口癒合的時候,疤痕的收縮會導致鼻子的縮短.才會引起朝天鼻.如果有做鼻中隔前移強化,無論是用矽膠或者是Gore-tex,都不會有朝天鼻的產生.
想請問手術後的傷口位子
您好: 鼻整形後手術後傷口的位置,是在鼻小柱的中間橫向的切口.
如果做鼻翼的整形~之後做隆鼻手術會有引響嗎???
您好 不會有影響
肋軟骨作鼻基部加卡麥拉鼻膜,修鼻翼請問大約多少錢呢?
您好 費用需要當面看診評估才能夠清楚.